Traveling to Matsu is not just about going; it’s often more about returning. To say this is a bit of nonsense; where is it not so? As long as travelers have the same concerns. But Mazu seems to be going back and forth, which is more urgent than that. Because the distance and time involved in space are appropriate. Is this a pivotal discussion? how to say? Because the former is related to the separation under the Cold War; the latter is related to the natural weather and political and economic separation. Let’s talk about the former first. In this frontitary downsizing, and economics, due to the small three links, the more and more.
It has become more and more depressed, and it has repeatedly confirmed the involuntary state of Daoxiang's dependence on Taiwan's Special Database development layout. Seriously, the generation of Matsu in the island township, due to the intervention of foreign hegemony in an international Cold War, not only turned into people who were cut off from their townships overnight; ; Then, once under the fog lock, the distant island of Taiwan is both a foreign country and a place of residence for some exiles; there is the "otherization" of Matsu by the island; or, to a certain extent, "otherization" The entanglement process in Taiwan.
Therefore, Matsu International Art Island hopes to reshape the subjectivity of the island through the process of artistic transformation. If, the island surrounded by the ocean, as the substance and symbol. The difference between the people living in the island township and the travelers should be the sense of urgency to return, rather than the sense of anxiety of leaving their hometown, which is also a matter of course. After all, it has been a homeland for generations, although it was forced to be isolated from the homeland under the blockade of the Cold War/Civil War.